Intel® Core™ i9-7960X X-series Processor
22M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz
Discover newer Intel Processors and experience Improved performance
Expert reviews
The overall review score is calculated from averaging this product's international review scores.
-
05/08/2019
SummaryWe recently updated our Linux testing suite a wee bit, making minor changes, but at the expense of dropping all single-threaded benchmarks – by accident. We hadn't thought much about every single set of results being hugely optimized for core counts, whic...
techgage.com -
12/26/2018
SummaryThe Intel i7-9700K received ample criticism at unveil for being the first “gaming,” S-class i7 in recent history to drop hyperthreading. The move was accompanied by an increase in physical core count to 8C, but followed the previous move from 4C/8T to 6C/...
gamersnexus.net
-
08/14/2018
SummaryThe Core i9-7960X offers the best performance from a 16-core processor in both lightly-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Expect to pay for the privilege of owning one, though. Moreover, thermal challenges dictate that expensive add-ons like custo...
tomshardware.comProsTurbo Boost frequencies improve singlethreaded performance, Leading IPC throughput, Multithreaded performance
ConsPoor thermal dissipation, Requires water cooling, Power consumption, Price
-
05/03/2018
SummarySo I think most people will admit that AMD has had a lot of wins this year with all of the Ryzen launches. As I found out in our 1700v7700K coverage the 7700K was still a great performing CPU, especially when looking at gaming performance. But with ju...
lanoc.org -
04/02/2018
Summarywe know for a fact that the best consumer processor money can buy right now is Intel's Core i9-7980XE. Its 18 cores of brutality lay waste to most, if not all, multithreaded tasks you can throw its way. And single-core? Well, it's enough to make most of t...
topnewreview.com -
09/30/2017
SummaryIn the 2000s, we had the frequency wars. Trying to pump all the MHz into a single core ended up mega-hurting one company in particular, until the push was made to multi-core and efficient systems. Now in the 2010s, we have the Core Wars. You need to have...
anandtech.com -
09/28/2017
SummaryIt's time once again to condense all of our test results into our famous value scatter plots. We use a geometric mean of all of our real-world results to ensure that no one test has an undue impact on the overall index. First up, let's look at gaming per...
Techreport.com -
09/27/2017
SummaryAs I said in my review of the Core i9-7980XE we are living in a very exciting time for CPUs. This processor is packing in 16-cores, 32-threads and it is not even at the top of the product stack! At its default clock speeds it is a work horse! It is going...
thinkcomputers.orgPros16 cores, 32-threads, Incredible multi-threaded performance, Good temperatures at default speeds, 35% performance increase over the i9-7900X
ConsYou'll need a good motherboard for overclocking, Quite expensive
-
09/25/2017
SummaryThat Intel finds itself in a place where its flagship processors just barely scrape past the competition is an astonishing turn of events. It might well continue to offer the best gaming performance in the mainstream, where gaming continues to be the key...
arstechnica.comProsThe fastest slice of silicon going, Good gaming performance, Improved memory support, Modern complement of I/O
ConsNot that much faster than Threadripper 1950X, Fewer PCIe lanes than the competition, Power hungry, Continual use of TIM instead of solder, High clock speeds and quiet systems out of the question without custom liquid cooling or delidding
-
09/25/2017
SummaryIntel's 16-core Core i9 chip hews close to its pricier 18-core Core i9 Extreme Edition counterpart. It's a powerful chip, no denying, but AMD's competing Threadripper 1950X, at many hundreds of bucks less, is strong competition. Read More...
computershopper.comProsSimilar performance, in many relevant instances, to Intel's pricier 18-core chip, Compatible Core X-Series motherboards start at lower prices than boards for AMD's Threadripper
Cons$700 pricier than AMD's competing 16-core counterpart
-
09/25/2017
SummaryIntel Core i9-7980XE And Core i9-7960X Processors -- Find Them At AmazonWe can't wrap up this article without referencing AMD's impressive Threadripper processors. Whether it's publicly acknowledged or not, the stealthy nature of Threadripper's developmen...
hothardware.comProsKiller Multi-Threaded Performance, Good Power Consumption, Insane Performance When Overclocked, Better Single-Thread Performance Then Ryzen
ConsExtremely Expensive, Some Anomalous Benchmark Results
-
09/25/2017
SummaryThe i9-7960X is extremely potent, but the price and power are tough pills to swallow...
pcgamer.comProsNearly as fast as the i9
ConsDiminishing returns as price increases, Overclocking needs a serious PSU and HSF, The i78700K is a far more sensible gaming CPU
-
09/25/2017
SummaryBut as I stated at the outset of this review, while performance per dollar is the king of metrics for consumers in the mainstream space, for HEDT and workstation users, sometimes expense is no object, within reason. For those types of buyers, the 18-core...
pcper.com -
09/25/2017
SummaryIntel. Strikes. Back. The massive 18-core Core i9-7980X and 16-core Core i8-7960X are the chipmaker's response to AMD's Ryzen Threadripper, which has been eating Intel's lunch for many months.But can Goliath Intel rise from its stunning defeat to challeng...
pcworld.com_techhive.com -
09/25/2017
SummaryThe results basically speak for themselves. If you would like to compare your own system(s) Linux performance against the results found in this article, simply install the Phoronix Test Suite and run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709241-TY-INTELCORE86...
phoronix.com -
09/25/2017
SummaryWe had a blast testing these monster CPU's out. Every single benchmark we ran was just crushed, and every single chart we have had to be expanded by nearly double to accommodate the multi-threaded scores. We had a few testing programs not know quite what...
proclockers.com -
09/25/2017
SummaryAs usual we have quite a bit of data to sort through. Of course, it's not just about delivering the best performance and instead most people are interested in bang for their buck.First up we have Blender, this is a lower is better scenario which is why th...
techspot.comProsFastest overall workstation performance available, especially for compression
ConsTerrible value compared to AMD's Threadripper chips. No ECC memory support
Retail prices reported as of 09 Aug 2022 06:14:58 GMT