Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-16EF0076-3C7E-4517-B98E-375C51AFCCE7
Legal Information
Getting Help and Support
Introduction
Coding for the Intel® Processor Graphics
Platform-Level Considerations
Application-Level Optimizations
Optimizing OpenCL™ Usage with Intel® Processor Graphics
Check-list for OpenCL™ Optimizations
Performance Debugging
Using Multiple OpenCL™ Devices
Coding for the Intel® CPU OpenCL™ Device
OpenCL™ Kernel Development for Intel® CPU OpenCL™ device
Mapping Memory Objects
Using Buffers and Images Appropriately
Using Floating Point for Calculations
Using Compiler Options for Optimizations
Using Built-In Functions
Loading and Storing Data in Greatest Chunks
Applying Shared Local Memory
Using Specialization in Branching
Considering native_ and half_ Versions of Math Built-Ins
Using the Restrict Qualifier for Kernel Arguments
Avoiding Handling Edge Conditions in Kernels
Using Shared Context for Multiple OpenCL™ Devices
Sharing Resources Efficiently
Synchronization Caveats
Writing to a Shared Resource
Partitioning the Work
Keeping Kernel Sources the Same
Basic Frequency Considerations
Eliminating Device Starvation
Limitations of Shared Context with Respect to Extensions
Why Optimizing Kernel Code Is Important?
Avoid Spurious Operations in Kernel Code
Perform Initialization in a Separate Task
Use Preprocessor for Constants
Use Signed Integer Data Types
Use Row-Wise Data Accesses
Tips for Auto-Vectorization
Local Memory Usage
Avoid Extracting Vector Components
Task-Parallel Programming Model Hints
Visible to Intel only — GUID: GUID-16EF0076-3C7E-4517-B98E-375C51AFCCE7
Using Loops
The Intel® Graphics device is optimized for code, which does not branch or loop. In the case, when a loop in a kernel is unavoidable, minimize the overhead by unrolling the loop either partially or completely in code, or using macros, and also minimize memory accesses within the loop.
The following example demonstrates partial unrolling of a loop in the example OpenCL™ kernel. Suppose you evaluate a polynomial, and you know that the order of the polynomial is a multiple of 4. Consider the following example:
__kernel void
poly(float *in, float *coeffs, float* result, int numcoeffs)
{
// Un-optimized version
int gid = get_global_id(0);
result[gid] = 0;
for(uint i=0; i<numcoeffs; i++) //numcoeffs is multiple of 4
{
result[gid] += pow(in[gid],i)*coeffs[i];
}
}
The above code is an indeterminate loop—that is, the compiler does not know how many iterations the for loop executes. Furthermore, there are 3 memory accesses within each iteration of the loop, and the loop code must be executed each iteration. You can remove these overheads using partial loop unrolling and private variables, for example:
__kernel void
poly(float *in, float *coeffs, float* result, int numcoeffs)
{
// Optimized version #1
int gid = get_global_id(0);
float result_pvt;
float in_pvt = in[gid];
result_pvt = 0;
for(uint i=0; i<numcoeffs; i+=4) //numcoeffs is multiple of 4
{
result_pvt += pow(in_pvt,i)*coeffs[i];
result_pvt += pow(in_pvt,i+1)*coeffs[i+1];
result_pvt += pow(in_pvt,i+2)*coeffs[i+2];
result_pvt += pow(in_pvt,i+3)*coeffs[i+3];
}
result[gid] = result_pvt;
}
In this optimized version, we divide the number of iterations by 4, and do only one memory access per original iteration. In any case where memory accesses can be replaced by private variables, this provides significant performance benefit. Furthermore, if multiple similar memory accesses are occurring in different kernels, then using shared local memory might provide performance gain. See section “Kernel Memory Access Optimization Summary” for details.
Another way to promote loop unrolling is to use macros to set constant loop iterations. The modified code:
__kernel void
poly(float *in, float *coeffs, float* result, int numcoeffs)
{
// Optimized version #1
int gid = get_global_id(0);
float result_pvt;
float in_pvt = in[gid];
result_pvt = 0;
for(uint i=0; i<NUMCOEFFS; i++)
{
result_pvt += pow(in_pvt,i)*coeffs[i];
}
result[gid] = result_pvt;
}
And from the host code, when compiling, use the flag:
-DNUMCOEFFS=16 // where 16 is the number of coefficients
It is possible when the loop iterations are known in advance, but you can also use this optimization to define the number of partial unrolls to use, in the case when you know a common denominator for all loop iterations.
When within a loop, use uint data types for iterations, as the Intel® Graphics is optimized for simple arithmetic (increment) on unsigned integers.
Did you find the information on this page useful?
Feedback Message
Characters remaining: