Students investigate the role of genetics in their environment, particularly how it determines their physical traits. They learn to identify dominant and recessive traits and develop an understanding of how the relationship between these traits determines genetic outcomes. Further investigation introduces the role of genetics in plants and animals. Students study the work of Gregor Mendel and learn how to predict genetic outcomes using Punnett Squares. They apply what they have learned to produce new flowers using specific genetic crosses. Students also consider the role of genetics in agriculture and take on the responsibility of a genetic engineer as they create a new food item with a positive environmental impact.
What makes me the way I am?
How is our world influenced by genetics?
How can I use data to predict outcomes?
What is the impact of manipulating the genes of an organism?
What is the relationship between phenotype, genotype, chromosomes, and genes?
How are inherited traits passed from generation to generation?
How do dominant and recessive traits predict genetic outcomes?
View how a variety of student-centered assessments are used in the Where’d You Get Those Genes Unit Plan. These assessments help students and teachers set goals; monitor student progress; provide feedback; assess thinking, processes, performances, and products; and reflect on learning throughout the learning cycle.
Prior to the unit, arrange for a geneticist or genetic engineer to speak with the students. This can be accomplished through a video conference or face-to-face interview. To ensure a positive and educational experience, consider the following questions prior to the classroom interview:
Speak with the genetics expert prior to the classroom interview, clearly communicating your expectations for learning. You may also require students to prepare for the interview by brainstorming a list of potential questions they would like to ask.
Part 1: Introducing the Unit
Ask students to consider the question, What makes me the way I am? Divide the class into groups of 4 or 5 and instruct each student to share one characteristic, or trait, about themselves (for example, “athletic” or “tall”). Ask the groups to consider whether each named trait is an inherited trait or a learned trait. As a whole class, brainstorm a list of inherited vs. learned traits. Are there any traits that fit both categories?
Explain that this unit will investigate how inherited traits are passed from one generation to the next. Students will also explore how the science of genetics impacts more than just our physical appearance, applying this knowledge to plants and agriculture. Ask students to consider the ability of scientists to alter genetic outcomes. Present the unit question, How is our world influenced by genetics? to set them up for the culminating project and their role as responsible genetics engineers.
Throughout the unit, students will use a Collaboration Rubric to self-assess their role and contributions as a team member during group work. Distribute and discuss the rubric with students.
Gauging Student Needs
While students are in the same groups, ask them to complete the K (Know), W (Wonder), and H (How to learn) columns of their K-W-L-H Chart. Conduct a large-group discussion of the results. Introduce the following Content Questions during the discussion:
It may be useful to write the content questions on large posters and display them around the classroom. At the end of each day, ask students to apply their new knowledge and write the answers on the posters. This can also serve as an effective review tool at the conclusion of the unit.
Part 2: Building Genetics Concepts
Exploring Single-Gene Human Traits
This activity introduces students to single-gene traits in humans. It reinforces the concepts of dominant/recessive genes and demonstrates how genes are passed from one generation to the next.
To begin, ask for a volunteer student to stand at the front of the room. The other students brainstorm a list of inherited traits that make up the volunteer’s physical appearance. Write all ideas on the board.
Next, conduct a short genetics mini-lesson on single-gene traits.
Return to the list of physical traits on the board. Circle the traits that can be attributed to dominant and recessive variations of a single human gene. Then ask students to predict whether each circled trait exhibits the dominant phenotype or the recessive phenotype. Finally, pass out the table of Single-Gene Traits in Humans and make corrections on the board as needed.
Next, students complete the table by determining whether their own phenotype is dominant or recessive for each trait. It might be helpful to use student volunteers to demonstrate some of the traits, such as thumb crossing and tongue rolling. Distribute a piece of PTC test paper to each student for the PTC test. Students place the paper on the tip of their tongue to see if they can taste anything. The chemical tastes bitter to those who can taste it. For those who cannot taste PTC, the paper has no taste. PTC test paper is inexpensive and can be purchased from Sargent Welch (www.sargentwelch.com*), Carolina Math and Science (www.carolina.com*) or Ward’s Natural Science (www.wardsci.com*).
Students should also record their genotype. Ask students to explain why a dominant phenotype could be represented by a homozygous genotype (AA) or heterozygous genotype (Aa). Scientists use a shorthand symbol (A_) to represent these two possibilities.
At this point, the classroom will naturally be buzzing with students eager to compare their findings with other classmates! Ask students, Do you think that some genetic traits are more common in a population than others? Do you think dominant traits occur more frequently than recessive traits?
Distribute the Comparing Phenotypes handout and ask students to predict the percentage of students in the class who share each number of phenotypes with them. They will collect data from each student and determine how many traits they have in common with their classmates. Students will represent their data visually in a bar graph and analyze their data to draw conclusions. Generate a class discussion of the results. Discussion questions may include:
Extension Activity: Connect with a classroom of similar-aged students in another region of the United States or another country. This can be accomplished through EPals (www.epals.com*) or a similar organization. Ask students, Do you think that phenotypes vary by physical location? Compare your classroom data from the previous activity with data from another classroom. Are the percentages of students with each phenotype similar? Where do you see the greatest differences? Why do you think that regional location may influence genetic phenotypes?
Extension Activity: Complete the Tree of Genetic Traits* activity, published by the University of Utah (http://learn.genetics.utah.edu*). The students record their traits on leaf cut-outs and place their leaves on a large tree whose branches each represent a different combination of traits. When completed, the tree forms a visual representation of the frequency of trait combinations within the group.
Introducing Gregor Mendel
Prior to this activity, students should understand the relationship between chromosomes, genes, genotype, and phenotype. This activity reinforces the concept of dominant/recessive traits and introduces Mendelian genetics to explain how genotypes can be predicted.
Introduce the life and work of Gregor Mendel and his contributions to the field of genetics. The Science Channel* has created a short video that introduces Mendel’s experiments with peas as one of the 100 greatest scientific discoveries.
Divide the class into 6 groups and assign each group one of the websites listed below:
Each group will assign roles:
Distribute The Mendel Report handout and give students ample time to complete each section. After completing the reports, pair each group of students with another group to share their findings and illustrations. This could also be accomplished as a jigsaw activity. Encourage students to seek information from other groups that may answer the questions written on their recording sheet. Have students use the Collaboration Rubric to self-assess their contributions to the group. Follow up with a class discussion about the life and contributions of Gregor Mendel.
An animated video biography of Gregor Mendel* can also be used to review and wrap-up this activity.
Using Punnett Squares
Punnett squares are one tool scientists use to predict the outcome of potential crossings of two parents. This activity provides the students with the basis for understanding how traits are passed on and expressed from one generation to the next.
Review the work of Gregor Mendel and his discoveries using peas. In the same way that Mendel could predict the traits of his pea plants, explain that we can use Punnett Squares to predict traits in animals and humans.
Conduct a short mini-lesson on Punnett Squares.
Next, students apply their knowledge of using Punnett Squares to predict future offspring in the Flower Fortunes activity (part one). Using Punnett Squares, each student horticulturist will attempt to create a unique designer flower by crossing two different colored flowers. Generate class discussion of the results.
Data Collection and Analysis
After completing the Flower Fortunes activity, students will realize that their attempts to create a white flower with purple spots proved to be unsuccessful. Present them with the next challenge: they will receive big money if they can produce roses with light blue petals. Complete the Flower Fortunes activity (part two) in small student groups of 2-3. Using Punnett Squares, students will predict the percentage of light blue offspring when crossing co-dominant white and blue roses. Generate class discussion of the results.
Extension Activity: Simulate the actual results of this cross using blue and white construction paper squares to represent the genes of each parent flower. Prepare 2 paper bags for each student, each bag should have 1 blue and 1 white paper square. Students pull out 2 squares (1 from each bag) and record the resulting genotype (BB, WW, or BW) 100 times. Record and analyze the data. How closely do the actual results match the Punnett Square predictions? Combine the data of the entire class to determine if the outcomes change.
Ask students to again self-assess their contributions within their group using the Collaboration Rubric.
Part 3: A Genetic Engineering Project
Students will now apply their knowledge to the field of genetic engineering and design a new food to solve a problem. They will begin to consider how our knowledge of genetics can be manipulated to produce desired offspring and create genetically-modified products while reflecting on the implications of this knowledge upon the greater world.
Before introducing the project, review the key genetics concepts students have just explored in a whole group discussion:
When it comes to food, agriculture is highly responsive to consumer demands. Genetic engineers are continually trying to create fruits and vegetables that people prefer. Using highly specialized technology, scientists can pinpoint specific genes and add, remove, or transfer this genetic material from one organism to another to obtain offspring with traits that are desirable for consumers. Some positive outcomes of genetic engineering:
It is also important to present the controversial side of genetic engineering. Ask your students to consider issues such as ethics, cost, benefits, and drawbacks of creating food that is genetically modified. Distribute a Discussion Rubric to establish high expectations for classroom discussion and engaged learning. Share current related news articles and open up a class discussion about potential future implications of genetic engineering. Use a Critical Thinking Rubric to help students self-assess their critical thinking skills while identifying important information, evaluating sources, and communicating an opinion during class discussion.
Becoming a Genetic Engineer
One potential of genetic engineering is the ability to combine traits from different foods to form a new plant, such as the Pluot (a mix between the plum and the apricot) or the Tangelo (a tangerine and an orange). This is called selective breeding. Another potential is to prevent crop destruction (for example, foods that are resistant to pesticides or drought) using genetic engineering. In this next activity, students will use their imagination and knowledge of genetics to create a new hypothetical food that solves a problem and has a positive environmental impact.
As a whole group, brainstorm a list of foods that could be genetically altered. Encourage your students to consider many different aspects of food, such as:
Distribute the Become a Food Engineer* project planning sheet. Explain the concepts of selective breeding and genetic engineering. Each student will brainstorm, plan and create a new food item that addresses some concern. They will endorse and campaign for their imaginary food with a magazine advertisement. A Food Engineer Checklist will help students stay focused and assess their project components. Students can publish and share their projects on a class wiki* or a classroom website. An alternative option is to create a PowerPoint* presentation.
Part 4: Unit Wrap-Up
Revisit the K-W-L-H Charts from the beginning of the unit and ask students to complete the “L” column with information they have learned throughout the unit. Review the unit content questions as well as questions from the “W” column of the students’ charts. Address any remaining questions or misconceptions.
If time and student interest permit, you can follow up or extend the unit with Designer Genes: One Size Fits All?, another unit plan from the Designing Effective Projects collection. In this unit, student genetics experts help farmers in a blight-stricken region of Mexico decide whether to use genetically engineered corn.
English Language Learner
This unit was designed and written by Lisa Fisher, a teacher in Wilsonville, OR.
This unit is aligned to Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards.