# Data Alignment to Assist Vectorization

Published: 09/07/2013

Last Updated: 01/22/2021

Compiler Methodology for Intel® MIC Architecture

## Data Alignment to Assist Vectorization

### Overview

Data alignment is a method to force the compiler to create data objects in memory on specific byte boundaries. This is done to increase efficiency of data loads and stores to and from the processor. Without going into great detail, processors are designed to efficiently move data when that data can be moved to and from memory addresses that are on specific byte boundaries. For Intel® processors that support Intel® AVX-512 instructions (codenames: SKYLAKE-AVX512, ICELAKE-SERVER, etc.), memory movement is optimal when the data starting address lies on 64 byte boundaries. This is also true for the Intel® Many Integrated Core Architecture (Intel® MIC Architecture) such as the Intel® Xeon Phi™ Coprocessor. Thus, it is desired to force the compiler to create data objects with starting addresses that are modulo 64 bytes.

In addition to creating the data on aligned boundaries (that aligns the base pointer), the compiler is able to perform optimizations when the data access (including base-pointer plus index) is known to be aligned by 64 bytes. In typical situations, the compiler does not know that data is aligned inside loops without some help from the user. This can force the compiler to do conservative code generation leaving performance on the table. Thus, you must also inform the compiler of this alignment via a combination of pragmas (C/C++) or directives (Fortran), options (such as -align array64byte in Fortran), and clauses/attributes so that the Intel compiler can generate optimal code.

To summarize, two steps are needed:

1. Align the Data.
2. Use pragmas/directives and clauses in performance critical regions (where the data is used) to tell the compiler that memory accesses are aligned.

### Topics

#### 1. Align the Data

It is important to align data for application performance. Typically this means two things:

• Aligning the base-pointer where the space is allocated for the array (or pointer)
• Making sure the starting indices have beneficial alignment properties for each vectorized loop (for each thread)

Aligning STATIC Arrays (Base Pointer)

For static arrays, use an appropriate clause/attribute or option as described below to align the base-pointer. Once you do this, the data will be allocated at a good boundary AND the compiler will recognize alignment of the base-pointer for these arrays at all use sites.

Note that in Fortran, these properties extend to dynamic arrays as well when you compile with the option -align array64byte as detailed below. Similarly, if you use !dirattributes align:64 for aligning Fortran module data (including allocatable arrays), the compiler detects the alignment of the base-pointer at USE sites. EXAMPLE: Statically declaring a 1000 element single precision floating point array A on a 64-byte boundary (optimal for Intel® processors that support Intel® AVX-512 instructions) • With Windows C/C++, __declspec(align(64)) float A[1000]; • With Linux/Mac C/C++, float A[1000] __attribute__((aligned(64))); • Fortran arrays: Use the Intel compiler option -align arraynbyte. With Fortran, the easiest way to get array data aligned is to use compiler option -align arraynbyte to get all arrays, static or dynamic, aligned on a 64 byte boundary. This option DOES NOT align data in COMMON blocks. You can also align arrays with a directive. Directives in your code remove the need to remember the -align arraynbyte compiler option by explicitly calling out the alignment in your code where the variable is declared. Here is an example: real :: A(1000) !dir attributes align: 64:: A
• Fortran COMMON data: align all common block entities on 64 byte boundaries by inserting padding (additional variables) or increasing array dimensions as needed. The options -align zcommons (and similar) DO NOT align data for vectorization. -align zcommons pads data to the SMALLER of 32 bytes or natural alignment. If your data are REAL(8) arrays, they will be aligned to an 8 byte boundary, not a 32 byte boundary!
NOTE: In addition to violating the Fortran standard, automatic insertion of padding bytes may break many legacy applications that assume COMMON entities are packed and have no padding. Automatic padding is rarely a good idea; instead, to ensure natural alignment, order variables in a common block so that the largest data types appear first, or create separate common blocks for data of different sizes.

• The start of a common block may be aligned using a directive, e.g.:

!DIRATTRIBUTES ALIGN : 64 :: /common_name/ Because arrays in common are storage associated, this cannot be used to align arrays within a common block. The start of a common block cannot currently be aligned using a command line switch such as -align array64byte. This may be possible in a future compiler version. • Fortran derived type data element: Allocatable arrays that are components of derived types may be aligned as described for dynamic data below. Static data cannot be aligned in this way. The compiler option -align recnbyte does NOT in general align components of derived types and fields within record structures on the boundary specified by (n). It simply ensures natural alignment, as described under "Fortran COMMON data". If you make your derived type a SEQUENCE derived type, then you can ensure alignment of components by inserting padding variables or increasing array dimensions as described above for common blocks. Also as for common blocks, you can ensure alignment of the start of the derived type using an ATTRIBUTES ALIGN directive. • Fortran module data: See the code example below. module mymod real, allocatable :: a(:), b(:) real :: c(1000) !dir attributes align:64 :: a
!dirattributes align:64 :: b !dir attributes align:64 :: c
...
end module mymod

The switch -align array64byte also applies to arrays inside modules, including static arrays.

Aligning DYNAMIC Data

C/C++: Replace malloc() and free() with alignment specified replacement _mm_malloc() and _mm_free(). These routines take an alignment parameter (in bytes) as the second argument. These replacements provided by the Intel C++ Compiler also use the same size argument and return types as malloc() and free(). The returned data from _mm_malloc(p, 64) will be 64  byte aligned.

• _aligned_malloc()
• _mm_malloc() and _mm_free()
• buf = (char*) _mm_malloc(bufsizes[i], 64);

Note that for C/C++ arrays that are dynamically allocated, it is not enough to just align the data during creation using mm_malloc (which is a necessary condition), but it also requires a clause of the form __assume_aligned(a, 64) before the loop of interest. Without this step, the compiler will not detect the optimal alignment for accesses using such arrays. This is discussed more in a later section of this article.

Fortran: Use the -align arraynbyte compiler option OR use !dirattributes align:n for aligning Fortran module allocatable arrays. See also the alignment related sections in the article Fortran Array Data and Arguments and Vectorization. Setting Alignment Properties for the Starting-Index of Data Inside Loops For an i-loop that has a memory access of the form a[i+n1], the loop has to be structured in such a way that the starting-indices have specific alignment properties. This means the user has to ensure that (lower-bnd-of-i-loop + n1) is a multiple of 16 (assuming float datatype). The user has to also notify the compiler about this property except for the cases where the information is available statically at compile-time (examples: access is of the form x[i] and the loop lower-bound is the constant 0 for all threads, accesses of the form b[i+16*k] inside such a loop). For all other cases, this step will also require adding a clause of the form __assume(n1%16==0) OR a #pragma vector aligned before the loop. This is discussed more in the next section. #### 2. Inform the Compiler About the Data Alignment Now that you have aligned your data, it is necessary to inform the compiler that this data is aligned where that data is actually used in the program. For example, when you pass data as arguments to a performance critical function or subroutine, how does the compiler know if the arguments are aligned or unaligned? For example, data is often declared in one source file but used in many other source files. Therefore this information must be provided by the user since the compiler often has no information about the arguments. There are two methods for informing the compiler about data alignment. One method is to use the OpenMP* SIMD ALIGNED clauses to inform the compiler about data alignment where the data is used. The other method is to use Intel proprietary clauses to specify data alignment within your code. Using the first method, OpenMP, provides an open non-proprietary solution for specifying data alignment. This can help insure portability of your code to other architectures and compilers. The Intel® Compilers fully support the OpenMP SIMD clauses. This article does not discuss OpenMP SIMD which is discussed here. Both methods can inform the compiler about data alignment. Another method is to use Intel clauses to inform the compiler about data alignment is to use Intel clauses. An advantage of Intel clauses is that they are not restricted to loop structures. We will focus on Intel clauses in this article. For the compiler to generate an aligned load/store for (float array) memory accesses (such as a[i+n1] and X[i]) inside an i-loop, it has to know: 1. Base-pointer (a and X) is aligned. For static arrays, this can be achieved using the techniques discussed above - such as using __declspec(align(64)). For arrays that are dynamically allocated, it is not enough to just align the data during creation using mm_malloc, but it also requires a clause __assume_aligned(a, 64) as shown below. 2. The compiler has to know that (lower-bnd-of-i-loop + n1) is a multiple of 16. If lower-bnd is 0 (for each thread that executes this loop), then the information needed is that n1 is a multiple of 16. One way of doing this is to add a clause of the form __assume(n1%16==0) Clauses such as __assume_aligned and __assume tell the compiler that the property holds at the particular point in the program where the clause appears. So the statement __assume_aligned(a, 64); means the pointer a is aligned at 64 bytes whenever program execution reaches this point. Compiler may propagate that property to other points in the program (such as a later loop), but this behavior is not guaranteed (it is possible that compiler has to make conservative assumptions and cannot apply the property safely for a later loop in the same function). These clauses are different from loop pragmas (or directives) such as #pragma vector aligned that have to be specified just before a loop and apply only to the immediately following loop. For example, the __assume_aligned and __assume clauses can even be specified inside a loop, but the pragma has to appear before the loop. C/C++ Example 1: __declspec(align(64)) float X[1000], X2[1000]; void foo(float * restrict a, int n, int n1, int n2) { __assume_aligned(a, 64); __assume(n1%16==0); __assume(n2%16==0); for(int i=0;i<n;i++) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses X[i] += a[i] + a[i+n1] + a[i-n1]+ a[i+n2] + a[i-n2]; } for(int i=0;i<n;i++) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses X2[i] += X[i]*a[i]; } } It is always a good idea to check that the compiler generated aligned accesses as expected for a vectorized loop. This information is part of the optimization report output from the compiler. For example, compilation of the above example shows: Compiler options: -O3 -xcore-avx512 -qopt-report-phase=vec -qopt-report=5 -qopt-report-file=stdout -restrict -c Begin optimization report for: foo(float *__restrict__, int, int, int) Report from: Vector optimizations [vec] LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(8,3) remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,13) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i+n1] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,20) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i-n1] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,30) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i+n2] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,39) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i-n2] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,49) ] remark #15305: vectorization support: vector length 8 remark #15399: vectorization support: unroll factor set to 2 remark #15300: LOOP WAS VECTORIZED remark #26013: Compiler has chosen to target XMM/YMM vector. Try using -qopt-zmm-usage=high to override remark #15448: unmasked aligned unit stride loads: 6 remark #15449: unmasked aligned unit stride stores: 1 remark #15475: --- begin vector cost summary --- remark #15476: scalar cost: 19 remark #15477: vector cost: 1.620 remark #15478: estimated potential speedup: 10.770 remark #15488: --- end vector cost summary --- LOOP END LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(8,3) <Remainder loop for vectorization> remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,13) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i+n1] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,20) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i-n1] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,30) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i+n2] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,39) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i-n2] has aligned access [ test1.c(9,49) ] remark #15305: vectorization support: vector length 4 remark #15309: vectorization support: normalized vectorization overhead 0.769 remark #15301: REMAINDER LOOP WAS VECTORIZED remark #15448: unmasked aligned unit stride loads: 3 remark #15449: unmasked aligned unit stride stores: 1 remark #15475: --- begin vector cost summary --- remark #15476: scalar cost: 9 remark #15477: vector cost: 0.870 remark #15478: estimated potential speedup: 9.570 remark #15488: --- end vector cost summary --- LOOP END LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(8,3) <Remainder loop for vectorization> LOOP END LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(12,3) remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X2[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X2[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,14) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,19) ] remark #15305: vectorization support: vector length 8 remark #15399: vectorization support: unroll factor set to 2 remark #15300: LOOP WAS VECTORIZED remark #26013: Compiler has chosen to target XMM/YMM vector. Try using -qopt-zmm-usage=high to override remark #15448: unmasked aligned unit stride loads: 3 remark #15449: unmasked aligned unit stride stores: 1 remark #15475: --- begin vector cost summary --- remark #15476: scalar cost: 9 remark #15477: vector cost: 0.870 remark #15478: estimated potential speedup: 9.570 remark #15488: --- end vector cost summary --- LOOP END LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(12,3) <Remainder loop for vectorization> remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X2[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X2[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,5) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference X[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,14) ] remark #15388: vectorization support: reference a[i] has aligned access [ test1.c(13,19) ] remark #15305: vectorization support: vector length 4 remark #15309: vectorization support: normalized vectorization overhead 1.429 remark #15301: REMAINDER LOOP WAS VECTORIZED remark #15448: unmasked aligned unit stride loads: 3 remark #15449: unmasked aligned unit stride stores: 1 remark #15475: --- begin vector cost summary --- remark #15476: scalar cost: 9 remark #15477: vector cost: 0.870 remark #15478: estimated potential speedup: 9.570 remark #15488: --- end vector cost summary --- LOOP END LOOP BEGIN at test1.c(12,3) <Remainder loop for vectorization> LOOP END You can see that the core loop gets vectorized with a vector-length of 8 and unrolled by 2 and has all aligned accesses for both loops in the source. C/C++ Example 2: For a specific variable, use the __assume_aligned macro to inform the compiler that a particular variable or argument is aligned. For example, to inform the compiler that an array passed in as an argument or in global data is aligned you would do the following: void myfunc( double p[], int n ) { __assume_aligned(p, 64); for (int i=0; i<n; i++) { p[i]++; } } void myfunc2( double *p2, double *p3, double *p4, int n) { for (int j=0; j<n; j+=8) { __assume_aligned(p2, 64); __assume_aligned(p3, 64); __assume_aligned(p4, 64); for (int i=0; i<8; i++) { p2[j+i] = p3[j+i] * p4[j+i]; } } }  Fortran Example 1: Use the ASSUME_ALIGNED directive. Note that ASSUME_ALIGNED refers to the properties of an array, not to its local usage, so its most natural location is at the point of declaration. An ASSUME_ALIGNED directive for a module array must appear in that module, and not at a loop where the array is accessed via use association. !DIR ASSUME_ALIGNED A: 64
...
do i=1, N
A(I) = A(I) + 1
end do

!DIRASSUME_ALIGNED A: 64 ... A = A + 1 Fortran Example 2: Use the ASSUME directive to assert properties of alignment. Here is an example of a loop where the compiler takes advantage of the user-provided directives to generate all aligned accesses. ASSUME in this case indicates that the length of f2 is a multiple of 8. subroutine sot(a,f2,st,rep,rstr) real*8 :: a(*),a1 integer f2,st,rep,rstr,i !DIR ASSUME_ALIGNED A: 64
!DIR$ASSUME (mod(f2,8) .eq. 0) !dir$ simd
do i=1,(rep-1)*rstr+1
a1=a(i)+a(f2*st+i)
a(f2*st+i)=a(i)-a(f2*st+i)
a(i)=a1
enddo
end subroutine

The example below shows how to use the vector pragma/directive to override the vectorizer.

C/C++ Example 3: This is a technique for managing aligned and unaligned accesses. Use __assume_aligned and __assume to inform the compiler that all RHS memory references are 64 byte aligned.

float *p, *p1, *q, *q1;

void foo(int n, int n1, int n2, int n3, int n4, int n5) {
__assume_aligned(q,64);
__assume_aligned(q1,64);
__assume_aligned(p,64);
__assume_aligned(p1,64);
__assume(n1%16==0);
__assume(n2%16==0);
__assume(n3%16==0);

__assume(n4%16==0);

__assume(n5%16==0);

#pragma simd
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
q[i] = p[i]+p[i+n1]+p[i+n2]+p[i+n3]+p[i+n4]+p[i+n5];
}

#pragma simd
for(int i=0;i<n;i++){
q1[i] = p1[i]+p1[i+n1]+p1[i+n2]+p1[i+n3]+p1[i+n4]+p1[i+n5];
}
}


Use the VECTOR Pragma/Directive

A more general pragma or directive can be put in front of a loop to indicate that ALL data in a given LOOP is aligned. In this way you do not have to specify each variable as shown in the previous methods. Add #pragma vector aligned before a loop to assert that ALL array accesses inside the loop are aligned (the programmer is responsible for ensuring this is indeed the case otherwise SEG FAULTS will occur). Note that this pragma/directive needs to be added just before each applicable vector loop.

C/C++ Example 4:

__declspec(align(64)) float X[1000], X2[1000];
void foo(float * restrict a, int n, int n1, int n2) {
int i;
#pragma vector aligned
for(i=0;i<n;i++) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses
X[i] += a[i] + a[i+n1] + a[i-n1]+ a[i+n2] + a[i-n2];
}

#pragma vector aligned
for(i=0;i<n;i++) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses
X2[i] += X[i]*a[i];
}
}

Fortran Example 3:

!DIR$VECTOR ALIGNED do I=1, N A(I) = B(I) * C(I) + D(I) end do !DIR$ VECTOR ALIGNED
A = B * C + D

NOTE: These clauses directly override the efficiency heuristics in the compiler vectorizer. These clauses cause the compiler to use aligned data movement instructions for all array references. These clauses disable all the advanced alignment optimizations of the compiler, such as determining alignment properties from the program context or using dynamic loop peeling to make references aligned. Be careful when using these clauses. Instructing the compiler to implement all array references with aligned data movement instructions will cause a runtime exception if some of the access patterns are actually unaligned.

NOTE: The OpenMP 4.0 standard  includes a !OMP SIMD directive that takes an ALIGNED clause. This may also be used to assert alignment of data in loops that are to be vectorized but not threaded. Vector Alignment and Loop Parallelization When a vectorized loop (inner-level) is nested within OpenMP* parallelized loop (outer-level), the alignment pragmas/clauses work as in the sequential case. Using the same techniques, a user can mark the loop with a vector pragma/directive and the compiler will generate vectorized code with aligned accesses. Fortran Example 4: subroutine initialize(a,b,c) double precision a(ni,nj,nk), b(ni,nj,nk), c(ni,nj,nk) integer i, j, k !OMP PARALLEL do  collapse(2)
do k=1, nk
do j=1, nj
!dir\$ vector aligned
do i=1, ni
a(i,j,k) = 2.d0*i
b(i,j,k) = 3.d0*j
c(i,j,k) = 4.d0*k
end do
end do
end do
end subroutine initialize

When the parallelization and vectorization occur at the same level-loop (as opposed to a nested loop), there are some additional considerations. In this case, even if the loop lower-bound is well-formed (e.g. the lower bound value is 0 in C or 1 in Fortran), after work-partitioning, each thread starts with its own lower-bound for the loop. These bounds are determined at runtime based on the OpenMP scheduling type (static-chunk, static-even, dynamic, guided, etc.), the number of threads, etc. These values are unknown to the compiler. If the user adds a “#pragma vector aligned” to such a loop, then it is the user responsibility to restrict the runtime-parameters in such a way that optimal alignment properties hold for each thread. Otherwise, the application will SEG FAULT for some OpenMP runtime parameters.

One way of making sure that OpenMP static scheduling achieves good alignment results for such a loop is to restrict the iteration count of the parallel loop (and let the remaining iterations get processed in a serial fashion) as shown below:

C/C++ Example 5a: Given the loop below, rewrite the loop to attain the desired alignment.

   static double * a;
a = _mm_malloc((N+OFFSET) * sizeof(double),64);
#pragma omp parallel for
for (j = 0; j < N; j++)
a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

C/C++ Example 5b:

    static double * a;
a = _mm_malloc((N+OFFSET) * sizeof(double),64);
#pragma omp parallel
{
#pragma omp master
{
// Assuming omp static scheduling, carefully limit the loop-size to N1 instead of N
// printf("num_threads = %d, N = %d, N1 = %d, num-iters in remainder
// serial loop = %d, parallel-pct = %f\n", num_threads,
// N, N1, N-N1, (float)N1*100.0/N);
}
}

#pragma omp parallel for
#pragma vector aligned
for (j = 0; j < N1; j++) // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses
a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

// Serial loop to process the last N-N1 iterations
for (j = N1; j < N; j++)
a[j] = 2.0E0 * a[j];

C/C++ align_value Attribute

The Intel C/C++ Compiler (14.0 and later versions) supports the align_value attribute as indicated below.

• Windows:
__declspec(align_value(alignment))
• Linux:
_attribute__((align_value(alignment)))

The argument of this attribute specifies the alignment (in bytes - 8,16,32,64,...) for what the pointer points to. This keyword can be added to a pointer typedef declaration to specify the alignment value of pointers declared for that pointer type.

When the pointer type is used to declare a formal parameter, the compiler inserts an __assume_aligned directive for the formal parameter on entry to the function. When the pointer type is used to declare a local variable, the compiler inserts an __assume_aligned directive at the initialization point of the local pointer. No directive will be inserted for global declarations.

NOTE: Once a variable is declared with this typedef, it is the responsibility of the user to ensure that all instances of that variable in the source code adhere to the good alignment properties. For example, it would be incorrect for the user to use pointer arithmetic of the form: *(out1++) in the example below since the 64-byte alignment would be lost after the pointer arithmetic.

C/C++ Example 6:

typedef double* __restrict__  __attribute__((align_value (64))) Real_ptr;

void T1(int len, Real_ptr out1, Real_ptr out2, Real_ptr out3, Real_ptr in1, Real_ptr in2)
{
for (int i=0; i<len ; ++i) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned acesses
out1[i] = in1[i] * in2[i] ;
out2[i] = in1[i] + in2[i] ;
out3[i] = in1[i] - in2[i] ;
}
}

C/C++ Example 7: This example shows the use of local variables declared with the align_value attribute.

typedef double* __restrict__  __attribute__((align_value (64))) Real_ptr;
typedef int Indx_type;

struct LoopData {
double *in1 ;
double *in2 ;
double *out1 ;
double *out2 ;
double *out3 ;
} ;

void foo3(LoopData& d, Indx_type len)
{
Real_ptr local_in1  = d.in1;
Real_ptr local_in2  = d.in2;
Real_ptr local_out1 = d.out1;
Real_ptr local_out2 = d.out2;
Real_ptr local_out3 = d.out3;

for(Indx_type i=0; i<len; ++i) {
local_out1[i] = local_in1[i] * local_in2[i] ;
local_out2[i] = local_in1[i] + local_in2[i] ;
local_out3[i] = local_in1[i] - local_in2[i] ;
}
}

C/C++ Example 8: Here is another example using the align_value attribute with a Lambda function.

typedef double* __restrict__  __attribute__((align_value (64))) Real_ptr;

template <typename LOOP_BODY>
inline  __attribute__((always_inline))
void forall(int begin, int end, LOOP_BODY loop_body)
{
for ( int ii = begin ; ii < end ; ++ii ) {
loop_body( ii );
}
}

void foo2(int len, Real_ptr out1, Real_ptr out2, Real_ptr out3, Real_ptr in1, Real_ptr in2)
{
forall(0, len, [&] (Indx_type i) { // Compiler vectorizes loop with all aligned accesses
out1[i] = in1[i] * in2[i] ;
out2[i] = in1[i] + in2[i] ;
out3[i] = in1[i] - in2[i] ;
} ) ;
}

C/C++ Example 9: You can use an “aligned” clause with a list of variables with “omp simd” to communicate the information that the specified base-pointer variables are aligned at a specific value. The example below shows a combination of this clause with some __assume clauses to convince the compiler to vectorize with all aligned accesses in both loops.

__declspec(align(64)) float X[1000], X2[1000];

void foo(float * restrict a, int n, int n1, int n2) {
int i;

__assume(n1%16==0);
__assume(n2%16==0);

#pragma omp simd aligned(X:64,a:64)
for(i=0;i<n;i++) {
X[i] += a[i] + a[i+n1] + a[i-n1]+ a[i+n2] + a[i-n2];
}

#pragma omp simd aligned(a:64)
for(i=0;i<n;i++) {
X2[i] += X[i]*a[i];
}

}


In this example, “#pragma omp simd aligned(X:64,a:64)” means the user is asserting that both X and a base pointers are aligned at 64-bytes.

Take Aways

Data alignment is a method to force the compiler to create data objects in memory on specific byte boundaries. This is done to increase efficiency of data loads and stores to and from the processor. For the Intel® processors that support Intel® AVX-512 instructions, memory movement is optimal when the data starting address lies on 64 byte boundaries.

In addition to creating the data on aligned boundaries, the compiler is able to make optimizations when the data is known to be aligned by 64 bytes. Thus, you must also inform the compiler of this alignment via pragmas (C/C++) or directives (Fortran) so that the compiler can generate optimal code. The one exception is that Fortran module data receives alignment information at USE sites.

NEXT STEPS

It is essential that you read this guide from start to finish using the built-in hyperlinks to guide you along a path to a successful port and tuning of your application(s) on Intel® AVX-512 instructions. The paths provided in this guide reflect the steps necessary to get best possible application performance.