Intel® Xeon® processor 3300 series-based servers: Optimized for small business, these value-priced processors with moderate DDR2 memory platform capacity make this ideal as a first small business server.
What is performance per system watt? Performance per system watt is calculated by taking the performance score from a benchmark or application and dividing it by the average system power usage (AC power from the wall). The corresponding performance/power or performance-per-watt scores are normalized to a baseline platform for comparison purposes.
Benchmark description for SPECpower_ssj*2008: New industry-standard benchmark for measuring energy efficiency of volume servers using a Server-side Java* application (similar to SPECjbb*2005). The graduated workload measures AC system power consumption in relation to performance and is reported as overall ssj_ops / watt result.
Configuration details: Published SPECpower_ssj*2008 benchmark results as of April 4, 2008:
| |
| HW Company Name |
System Name |
JVM Name |
JVM Instances |
Result |
Full Disclosure |
| Fujitsu Siemens* computers |
PRIMERGY* TX120 (Intel® Xeon® 3070) |
BEA JRockit* (P27.4.0-3-86647-1.6.0_02-20070801-1931-windows-x86_64) |
1 |
454 |
Text | HTML |
| Fujitsu Siemens* computers |
PRIMERGY* TX150 S6 (Intel® Xeon® X3220) |
BEA JRockit* (build P27.4.0-10-90053-1.6.0_02-20071009-1827-windows-x86_64) |
2 |
667 |
Text | HTML |
| Fujitsu Siemens* computers |
PRIMERGY* TX150 S6 (Intel® Xeon® X3360) |
BEA JRockit* (build R27.5.0-110-94909-1.6.0_03-20080204-1558-windows-x86_64, compiled mode) |
2 |
1,018 |
Text | HTML |
Intel® Xeon® Processor 3300 series-based servers: Optimized for small business, these value-priced processors with moderate DDR2 memory platform capacity make this ideal as a first small business server.
What is Performance per System Watt? Performance per system watt is calculated by taking the performance score from a benchmark or application and dividing it by the average system power usage (AC power from the wall). The corresponding performance/power or performance-per-watt scores are normalized to a baseline platform for comparison purposes. In these measurements, the Intel® Xeon® processor 3085 3.0GHz is the base platform (1.0). Intel focuses on performance per watt comparisons using power measured at the system level as opposed to component level TDP or max power ratings. Measured system level power is a more accurate representation of the customer's true energy cost.
Configuration details: The above chart compares Intel internally measured results as of January 7, 2008.
Benchmark description for Fluent*: Fluent is a commercial engineering application used to model computational fluid dynamics. The benchmark consists of nine standard workloads organized into small, medium and large models. These comparisons use all but the largest of the models which does not fit into the 8GB of memory available on the platforms. The Rating, the default Fluent metric, was used in calculating the ratio of the platforms by taking a geometric mean of the eight workload ratings measured.
Configuration details: Internally measured Fluent version 6.3.33 (eight of the nine standard, jobs/day) benchmark results as of January 7, 2008.
Intel® Xeon® Processor platform (3085 score 1611.1/avg sys watts 131; E3110 score 1874/avg sys watts 106.6; X3230 score 2294.3/avg sys watts 192.3; X3360 score 2976/avg sys watts 128.3): Intel® 3210 Chipset-based server platform using Intel® Xeon® Processor 3085 (3.00 GHz, 4 MB cache, 1333 FSB), E3110 (3.00 GHz, 6 MB cache, 1333 FSB, 45nm), X3230 (2.66 GHz, 8 MB cache, 1066 FSB), or X3360 (2.83 GHz, 12 MB cache, 1333 FSB, 45nm), 4x 2 GB DDR2-800 ECC CL5 DIMMs, 120 GB SATA HDD, Red Hat* Enterprise LINUX 64-bit. Source: Intel internal measurements TR#823/844.
* Other brands and names may be claimed as the property of others. SPEC, SPECint, SPECfp, SPECrate, SPECweb, SPECjbb are trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel® products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
Relative performance for each benchmark is calculated by taking the actual benchmark result for the first platform tested and assigning it a value of 1.0 as a baseline. Relative performance for the remaining platforms tested was calculated by dividing the actual benchmark result for the baseline platform into each of the specific benchmark results of each of the other platforms and assigning them a relative performance number that correlates with the performance improvements reported.
SPECint*2000/SPECint*2006 and SPECfp*2000/SPECfp*2006 benchmark tests reflect the performance of the microprocessor, memory architecture and compiler of a computer system on compute-intensive, 32-bit applications. SPEC benchmark tests results for Intel® microprocessors are determined using particular, well-configured systems. These results may or may not reflect the relative performance of Intel® microprocessor in systems with different hardware or software designs or configurations (including compilers). Buyers should consult other sources of information, including system benchmarks; to evaluate the performance of systems they are considering purchasing.
64-bit Intel® Xeon® processors with Intel® EM64T requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, OS, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel EM64T. Processor will not operate (including 32-bit operation) without an Intel EM64T-enabled BIOS. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Intel EM64T-enabled OS, BIOS, device drivers and applications may not be available. Check with your vendor for more information.
Intel® processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor series, not across different processor sequences. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details.
Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, life sustaining, critical control or safety systems, or in nuclear facility applications. All dates and products specified are for planning purposes only and are subject to change without notice.
Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase.
|