 |


Circuit keeps us informed and gives us a forum for exchanging ideas.
|
|
|
We routinely survey our employees
to learn what they think about our workplace. In 2004, we used the Organization
Health process to help collect valuable insights.
The survey processwhich we call "Org Health" for shorthelped us to identify
strengths and areas for improvement in our business groups and geographies, and
to provide data for planning and continuous improvement.
In 2004, an improved Org Health process allowed us to compare group scores on a
standard set of issues and review group-specific results. One of our largest
business groups, the Technology and Manufacturing Group, is still standardizing
the schedule and corporate-wide question set, which will be implemented in
2005.
The core set of items includes 27 multiple-choice questions as well as
additional open-ended questions. Of those questions, 12 could be benchmarked
externally, which helped us understand the results in a larger context. Each
business unit could also add supplemental items to directly address any issues
not raised in the core survey.
Out of Intel's 14 business groups, 13 implemented the Org Health process in
2004. A total of 54,575 employees, or about two-thirds, participated. From this
process, we learned that we are doing well on role-modeling Intel Values,
improving productivity, and treating each other with respect and trust.
Employees also responded that they understand how their work links to the
company's strategic objectives; that they have clear goals and objectives; that
they are empowered to make the decisions necessary to do their jobs; that
management is open to hearing their ideas and suggestions; that they feel free
to take risks; and that they are encouraged to find new and better ways of
doing things.
Results also pointed to areas for improvement. While employee input varied from
group to group, some of the top issues were performance appraisal and feedback,
retention, "great place to work" and work/life balance.
We are using the wealth of data from these employee surveys to help improve
satisfaction and retention. One specific outcome of the Org Health process in
2004 is a new Managing for Excellence program, which helps to ensure that
employees have clear goals and priorities, and holds managers accountable for
their performance as managers.
As part of the Managing for Excellence initiative, all business groups and
individual employees will be using a reinvigorated Intel Management by
Objectives process. This annual and quarterly planning process helps improve
individual and business results. It also sets priorities to be reviewed and
tracked during the year.
|
Type
|
Category
|
Americas
|
APAC
|
EMEA
|
U.S.
|
Total
|
| Contract/Intern |
Exempt Full Time |
26 |
302 |
149 |
154 |
631 |
| Exempt Part Time |
0 |
17 |
865 |
23 |
905 |
| Total
|
26
|
319
|
1,014
|
177
|
1,536
|
| Non-Exempt
Full Time |
14 |
682 |
208 |
234 |
1,138 |
| Non-Exempt
Part Time |
0 |
9 |
27 |
29 |
65 |
| Total |
14 |
691 |
235 |
263 |
1,203 |
| Contract/Intern
Total |
40
|
1,010 |
1,249 |
440
|
2,739 |
| Regular |
Exempt
Full Time |
1,119 |
11,342 |
7,974 |
34,074 |
54,509 |
| Exempt
Part Time |
4 |
2
|
124
|
172
|
302 |
| Total |
1,123 |
11,344 |
8,098 |
34,246 |
54,811 |
| Non-Exempt
Full Time |
1,328
|
10,118 |
3,550 |
14,718 |
29,714 |
| Non-Exempt
Part Time |
0 |
2 |
51 |
51 |
104 |
| Total |
1,328
|
10,120 |
3,601
|
14,769 |
29,818 |
| Regular
Total |
2,451
|
21,464
|
11,699
|
49,015
|
84,629 |
| Grand
Total |
2,491
|
22,474
|
12,948
|
49,455 |
87,368† |
|
APAC =
Asia-Pacific EMEA = Europe, Middle East and Africa
† Number of employees at year-end 2004, including interns and contractors.
|
|
|
Region
|
Year-End Headcount 2004
|
Turnover 2004
|
Turnover % 2004
|
Turnover % 2003
|
| Greater
Americas
|
2,451
|
204
|
7.7%
|
5.6%
|
| Greater
Asia
|
21,464
|
1,413
|
6.2%
|
5.6%
|
| Greater
Europe
|
11,699
|
721
|
5.8%
|
4.7%
|
| United
States
|
49,015
|
2,035
|
4.0%
|
3.5%
|
| Total
|
84,629
|
4,373
|
4.9%
|
4.2%
|
|
† Regular employees only; does not
include terminations due to divestiture, retirement, redeployment or Voluntary
Separation Program.
|
|
|
Reason for Termination
|
Count
|
|
Voluntary Separation Program
|
31
|
|
Redeployment††
|
284
|
|
Divestiture
|
3
|
|
Retired
|
172
|
|
† Regular employees only, including
those whose jobs were eliminated (who received no comparable offer or who
rejected an internal job offer), as well as those whose jobs were eliminated
and who left voluntarily or involuntarily.
†† Some 650 employees were impacted
by redeployment during 2004. Of these, 51% (~332) found other jobs in the
company.
|
|