2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Intel
Below are the voting results of the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For more detailed information about each proposal, see the company proxy statement.

Quorum
There were 6,536,879,169 shares outstanding and entitled to vote as of the March 24, 2003 record date. Of this total, 5,616,137,729 shares (85.91% of the shares outstanding) have voted either in person or by proxy.


1
 

Election of directors. (Proposal 1)
Election of all nominees listed below to the Board of Directors.

Director Votes For % of Votes Cast
on Proposal
Votes Withheld % of Votes Cast
on Proposal
Craig R.Barrett 5,490,799,060 97.77% 125,338,669 2.23%
John Browne 5,461,179,048 97.24% 154,958,681 2.76%
Winston H.Chen 5,463,995,977 97.29% 152,141,752 2.71%
Andrew S.Grove 5,528,110,572 98.43% 88,027,157 1.57%
D.James Guzy 5,458,765,404 97.20% 157,372,325 2.80%
Reed E. Hundt 5,525,129,508 98.38% 91,008,221 1.62%
Paul S Otellini 5,526,773,535 98.41% 89,364,194 1.59%
David S.Pottruck 5,490,113,294 97.76% 126,024,435 2.24%
Jane E.Shaw 5,462,907,024 97.27% 153,230,705 2.73%
David B.Yoffie 5,526,868,167 98.41% 89,269,562 1.59%
Charles E.Young 5,522,421,032 98.33% 93,716,697 1.67%


 

Expense Stock Options. (Proposal 2)
Stockholder Proposal requesting the expensing of Stock Options.

Shares For % of Votes Cast on Proposal** Shares Against % of Votes Cast on Proposal** Shares Abstaining* % of Votes Cast on Proposal
1,875,086,845 47.55% 1,913,677,878 48.53% 154,355,059 3.92%

* Pursuant to Section 216 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast is required to pass this resolution.
** A total of 3,943,119,782 votes were cast on this proposal , aggregating 60.32% of total shares outstanding. This is 1,673,017,947 fewer shares voted on this proposal than the 5,616,137,729 shares (85.91% of total shares outstanding) voted in the election of directors. The 1,673,017,947 shares are known as "broker non-votes", meaning that brokerage firm customers did not instruct their brokers on how to vote those shares on Proposal 2 and under stock exchange rules the brokers did not have the discretionary authority to vote the shares themselves.

Back to Top