 |

As 2001 progressed, it became increasingly clear
that the economy had drifted into a recession with worldwide impact.
Just as the high-tech sector had fueled the previously buoyant global
economy, it also led the way into the slow business climate.
In 2001, the high-tech industry was characterized
by high inventory levels and overcapacity of component and system
products. Parts of the high-tech infrastructure had been built ahead
of anticipated demand, leading many companies to cut back on their
computing and communications technology expenditures in 2001. In
addition, the dot-com collapse contributed to market declines that
affected all areas of the high-tech industry.
All this made for a pretty bleak year for Intel
financially. Revenues for 2001 were $26.5 billion, down 21% from
2000. Including acquisition-related costs of $2.5 billion, net income
for 2001 was $1.3 billion, down 88% from $10.5 billion in 2000.
Excluding these costs, net income was $3.6 billion, down 70% from
2000.
Our sales came from an increasingly international
market. We ended 2001 with nearly two-thirds of our sales generated
outside the Americas. In the fourth quarter, for the first time,
sales were largest in the Asia-Pacific region. A growing distributor
channel and strong processor and chipset sales helped drive this
trend, as Asia-Pacific increasingly becomes the manufacturing center
for the PC industry. However, sales were lower in all regions than
they were in 2000, reflecting the worldwide reach of the recession.
In response to the global slowdown, we focused
our efforts around three key principles. First, we believe that,
as in previous economic cycles, great new products will lead
the recovery. In 2001, we accelerated our efforts to develop
and introduce the products that we expect will help bring the industry
out of the downturn. In August, we introduced the Intel® Pentium® 4 processor running at 2.0 gigahertz, or
2.0 billion cycles per second. With its unique Intel® NetBurst
microarchitecture, the Pentium 4 processor is optimized for a richer
multimedia online experience. By year's end, we were building this
chip on our new 0.13-micron technology, increasing on-chip memory
while reducing processor size by nearly 30%.
We also continued to advance our 64-bit processor
for high-end servers and workstationsthe Intel®
Itanium processor. This processor is designed for
the most demanding data-intensive applications, such as enterprise
resource planning, scientific computing and graphics modeling. In
December 2001, our original equipment manufacturer customers began
shipping to end users their initial pilot systems based on our next-generation
Itanium processor, codenamed "McKinley." We anticipate
that this new processor will be generally available in mid-2002.
Our product roadmap acceleration efforts were
by no means confined to microprocessors. Our Ethernet products translate and transmit data across networks. In 2001, we
introduced and shipped in volume the world's first single-chip Gigabit
Ethernet controller, which operates 10 times faster than the previous
industry-standard product. Our Gigabit Ethernet solutions have been
widely adopted. As of the end of 2001, Intel products accounted
for more than half of the Gigabit Ethernet connections worldwide.
In flash memory, a critical ingredient of today's
smart cell phones and other handheld computing devices, we extended
our leadership by introducing the first flash memory built on the
0.13-micron manufacturing
process technology. The new flash chip is nearly half the size
of its predecessor and also consumes less power.
Our second key principle: we know that a downturn
is no time to shy away from strategic spending. Though the high-tech
industry was mired in overcapacity in 2001, we know from experience
that capacity wilts like lettuce. There's always too much of yesterday's
technology and never enough of tomorrow's. For Intel, tomorrow's
manufacturing capacity is necessary to build the advanced products
that we expect will help contribute to the recovery. Consequently,
during this downturn, we did what may seem counter-intuitive: we
accelerated our capital investments, spending $7.3 billion in 2001,
compared with approximately $10 billion in capital spending over
the previous two years combined. We also invested $3.8 billion in
research and development in 2001, mostly focused on silicon products
and processes.
|
 |