Students act as consulting investigators for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate the illnesses of a family in the area. They receive memos with clues that guide them through their team’s research of a potential toxin. Students use previous experience with gas laws and apply their knowledge to determine the source of the illness. Students evaluate four different claims and find research that either strengthens or weakens each claim. They use the Showing Evidence Tool to organize their evidence and come to a conclusion as to what is causing the illnesses. Students’ research and persuasive skills are put to the test as teams argue their conclusions in a mock trial.
View how a variety of student-centered assessments are used in The Case of the Mysterious Malady Unit Plan. These assessments help students and teachers set goals; monitor student progress; provide feedback; assess thinking, processes, performances, and products; and reflect on learning throughout the learning cycle.
Students should have prior experience studying gas behavior using the Ideal Gas Law, Charles' Law, Avogadro’s Law, and Boyle’s Law. They should also understand how pressure, volume, and temperature affect gas behaviors.
Review the concept of scientific claims with students by taping a few television commercials or choosing a few magazine ads that make claims that could be scientifically proven. Review the advertisements in class and ask the following questions to determine students’ understanding of how to evaluate scientific claims in persuasive media:
After students discuss the commercials, introduce the Essential Question, How do we decide which scientific claims to believe? Have students record their thoughts about the question in their science journals. Pair each student with a peer and have students share their ideas. Follow with a class discussion and record students’ thoughts on chart paper.
Prior to introducing the activity to students, become familiar with the Showing Evidence Web site. Familiarize yourself with the tool and read associated resources such as Walk Through an Example, Try Out the Tool, Classroom Strategies, Project Examples, and Benefits. Before proceeding with the next activity, click here to set up the Mysterious Malady project in your workspace.
Explain to students that they will take on the role of consulting investigators for the Environmental Protection Agency while evaluating the sickness of a family in the area. Tell students that they will evaluate four different claims concerning the cause of the illness and apply what they know from studying gas laws to determine the source of the illness. Various memos describe the symptoms and the situation of the family being investigated to guide student research.
Divide students into teams of two or three. Give students the timeline handout to help them assimilate the large number of symptoms, potential sources, and side effects they will be tracking. Use this handout to do informal checks of students’ organization and information tracking. Demonstrate the use of the Showing Evidence Tool by discussing the sample case together or creating a sample project to go over as a class. Show students how to add, describe, and rate evidence and claims. Be explicit in teaching students what is expected of them while using Showing Evidence. Discuss with them how much evidence will be needed to either strengthen or weaken a claim. Come to a consensus as a class if necessary. Work together with students to create an understanding of rating evidence reliability—create a rubric with the class to determine what one star means versus five stars as a rating of reliability. An example rating rubric is provided. Ask students to describe their understanding of claims and evidence in their journals.
Provide students with memo 1 and read it aloud in class while student teams track the information on the timeline handout. The first memo introduces symptoms Sally Citizen is suffering from and the possibility of black mold as a potential cause of Sally’s afflictions. Lead students in a discussion of the kinds of questions medical professionals ask when they are trying to diagnose someone's illness. Create a group discussion around the following questions:
Record students’ thoughts on chart paper and post the paper in the classroom for them to use as reference during research time.
Present the evidence rubric and ask students to use the rubric to periodically self- and peer-assess their evidence as they work through the project. Direct students to the list of resources and have them begin to research the first claim, The kinetic molecular theory explains that black mold spores are being spread throughout the home by air molecules and causing Sally's allergic reactions.
Allow time for peer review of each team’s work after each phase of student research. Peer review groups read and assess work of the group assigned to them. Each review group makes constructive comments and corrections where needed to the evidence and to the support or nonsupport of the claim. Refer to the discussion of scientific claims at the beginning of the unit. Encourage students to generate comments for their peer review sessions based on some of the ideas they came up with during the initial discussion. Periodically ask students to record their thoughts about the process of finding, evaluating, and using evidence to make decisions in their journals.
Continue with this research process as students receive memo 2, memo 3, and memo 4. As students read through each memo, have them input specifics into their timeline handout. Remind students that they should evaluate the symptoms detailed in the memo and research the source of the toxin causing the illness. If needed, review with students how gas laws can be applied to the situation being researched.
The Showing Evidence Tool space below represents one team's investigation in this project. The case you see is functional. You can double-click on any piece of evidence to read the team's descriptions.
Project Name: The Mysterious Malady (Click here to set up this project in your workspace)
Prompt: What is the cause and source of Sally's illness?
Explore an interactive demo.
After students complete their research for each of the claims, they must synthesize what they learned to make a recommendation to the EPA as to the most-likely cause and source of the sickness affecting all members of the Citizen family. Students write their conclusions in the Comment section of Showing Evidence. Each conclusion should clearly state the most likely claim, include one or two sentences summarizing the evidence that supports the claim, and address why the evidence does not support the other claims. While students work in teams, use the collaboration observation checklist to assess collaboration skills.
Each team defends its claim in a grand jury mock trial. For the trial, join teams with the same conclusion. Each group presents its findings in a 5 to 8 minute oral presentation with a multimedia component. See a portion of one team’s presentation. The team may use any supporting evidence gathered during research. The multimedia presentation should include the following:
Hand out the multimedia presentation rubric to help guide the process. After the presentation is created, ask students to self-assess their collaboration skills using the collaboration self-assessment rubric.
Tell students the mayor of Sally’s town is being investigated by a civil grand jury. Students act as expert witnesses in the mock trial and testify as to the most likely cause and source of the Citizen family’s illness. Distribute the grand jury investigation memo and investigation rubric and review the procedures and expectations for the mock trial. Explain to students that they will play two roles:
After all testimony is complete, the entire grand jury will take a vote as to the cause of the family’s illness, the source of the toxicant, the method by which the toxicant gets into the bloodstream, and whether indictments should be issued. Students vote by using the grand jury ballot.
Ask students to reflect on the trial and consider whether another group presented a claim with evidence that convinced them to change their original opinion. If so, have students reflect in their journals and share the reasons that made them change their mind. Share with students that this unit is based on an actual case. The EPA found that an air conditioner was actually leaking Freon, which thermally reacted with the fire from the pilot light and created the WWII nerve gas called phosgene. If the homeowners had actually used the central air conditioner, the Freon would have been depleted, and the air conditioner would have gone out, leading them to the leak.
Have students discuss whether their claim and outcome of the trial was similar to that of the actual results of the case. Have students reflect on their team’s claim, if it has changed, and how this exercise relates to the Essential Question, How do we decide which scientific claims to believe?
Debra Power teaches Chemistry and Physics in Placerville, California. She participated in the Intel® Teach Program, which resulted in this idea for a classroom project. A team of teachers expanded the plan into the example you see here.
Grade Level: 10-12
Topics: Environmental Science
Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Evaluation, Argumentation, Synthesis
Key Learnings: Evaluating Scientific Claims, Applying Gas Laws, Toxins
Time Needed: 2 weeks of instruction, 3 periods per week, 90-minute periods Background: California, United States