Power your breakthrough innovations with the highly parallel processing of the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor. We’ve packed up to a teraFLOPS of double precision peak performance into every chip—the highest parallel performance per watt of any Intel® Xeon® processor.1,2,3,4 Now you can think “reuse” rather than “recode” with x86 compatibility. Languages, tools, and applications run smoothly across the full spectrum of Intel® Xeon® processor family-based platforms. Plus, discover the flexibility of a coprocessor that can also host an operating system.
With the launch of the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 5110P, extracting extreme performance from highly parallel applications just got a lot easier. Part of the Intel® Xeon Phi™ product family, the 5110P is based on Intel® Many Integrated Core Architecture (Intel® MIC Architecture) and complements the industry‐leading performance and energy efficiency of the Intel® Xeon™ processor E5 family.
The Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor—illustrious performance per watt, built to perform brilliantly on your greatest challenges. The only thing more amazing than the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor is what your research will do with it.
Looking to find out if the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor is right for your applications? The following article will walk you through a simple process to quickly answer that question, and allow you to find out more about highly-parallel programming, vectorization, and memory bandwidth considerations: Is the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor right for me?
Looking to find out which systems support the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor? The following article describes the unique system requirements and provides information about where to obtain supported systems: Which systems support the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor?

View more Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 5110P specifications >

Get up to 1 teraFLOPS of double precision peak performance.1,2,3
Compared with Intel® Xeon® processor E5 family-based servers, the Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor delivers:
Increase server density by up to 7x greater FLOPS per rack by adding Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors to your Intel® Xeon® processor E5 family-based servers.1,3,10
View architectural diagram for Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor 5110P >

Applications can support both Intel® Xeon® processors and Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors which use common languages, models, and tools, including:
Leverage the compute flexibility of Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors:
Intel® Xeon® technology in broadcast equipment and servers at the National Association of Broadcasters. (2:20)
Showcases Intel technology in broadcast equipment and servers at the National Association of Broadcasters. (2:32)
Video: Intel and EMC at the National Association of Broadcasters Show, 2010 (6:09)
Showcases Intel technology in broadcast equipment and servers at the National Association of Broadcasters. (2:06)
Showcases Intel technology in broadcast equipment and servers at the National Association of Broadcasters. (2:15)
Nicholas Kirsch, Isilon Systems, gives a virtualization chalk talk at VMWorld 2009. (8:12)
Using Intel® AES-NI in cloud reduces code size, execution cycles, vulnerability to attack while boosting performance. (4:20)
Enhancing server and cloud security with Intel® Trusted Execution Technology
Learn how instrumentation delivered on Intel® Xeon® processors can improve data center efficiency. (2:54)
Intel® AES-NI offers new instructions that speed up enterprise encryption and offer better performance, security, and more. (2:30)
Power capping on Intel® Xeon® processor-based servers helps IT meet the requirements of increasing compute demand while lowering TCO. (2:27)
Counter-Strike*and PlanetSide 2* makers discuss development on Intel® Xeon® processor-based servers.
First American Corporation builds energy-efficient data center with Intel® Xeon® processors, lowers utility costs, server sprawl. (1:32)
Video: Intel IT datacenter adopts the Intel® Xeon® processors E7 family and projects USD 650 million value by 2014. (5:27)
NetBenefit deploys Intel® Xeon® processor 5500 series-based server, increasing performance and reducing power costs. (5:27)
1. Software en werklasten die in de prestatietests worden gebruikt, zijn mogelijk alleen geoptimaliseerd voor prestaties op Intel-microprocessors. Prestatietests, zoals SYSmark en MobileMark, worden gemeten met specifieke computersystemen, componenten, software, bewerkingen en functies. Wijziging van een van deze factoren kan ervoor zorgen dat de resultaten variëren. U dient overige informatie en prestatietests te raadplegen zodat u uw overwogen aankopen beter op grondige wijze kunt evalueren, inclusief de prestaties van het product in combinatie met andere producten. Voor meer informatie, surf naar www.intel.com/performance.
2. Claim is gebaseerd op de berekende theoretische peak double precisieprestatiemogelijkheden voor een enkele coprocessor. 16 DP FLOPS/clock/core * 60 cores * 1.053GHz = 1.0108 TeraFlop/s.
3. De resultaten zijn gebaseerd op interne analyses van Intel en worden slechts ter informatie verstrekt. Verschillen in de systeemhardware, het softwareontwerp of de -configuratie kunnen de daadwerkelijke prestaties beïnvloeden.
4. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2670 server vs. een enkele Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor SE10P (Intel gemeten DGEMM perf/watt score 309 GF/s @ 335W vs. 829 GF/s @ 195W)
5. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 productfamilie server vs. Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor (2.52x: Gemeten door Los Alamos Labs juni 2012. 2 socket E5-2687 (8 core, 3.1GHz) vs. 1 pre-productie Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor (60 cores, 1.0GHz) op een Molecular Dynamics applicatie. Voltooing berekening werkbelasting in 4uur 7m 10s vs. 1uur 38m 16s) (2.53x: Gemeten door Sinopec october 2012. 2 socket E5-2680 (8 core, 2.7GHz) server zonder een coprocessor vs. dezelfde server met 2 pre-productie Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors (61 cores, 1.091GHz) op een Seismic Imaging applicatie. Voltooing berekening werkbelasting in1342 seconden vs. 528.6 seconden).
6. Intel beheert, noch controleert het ontwerp of de implementatie van benchmarks van anderen of websites waar in dit document naar gerefereerd wordt. Intel raadt alle klanten aan om de websites te bezoeken waarnaar wordt verwezen of naar andere sites te gaan waar vergelijkbare prestatiebenchmarks worden gerapporteerd en te controleren of deze benchmarks nauwkeurig zijn en betrekking hebben op systemen die beschikbaar zijn voor aanschaf.
7. Berekende theoretische Peak Double precisie FLOPS (2 x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2670; 8C, 2.6 GHz vs. 1 x Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor SE10P; 61C. 1.1 GHz)
8. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 productfamilie server vs. Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor (2.2x: Gemeten door Intel october 2012. 2 socket E5-2670 (8 core, 2.6GHz) vs. 1 Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor SE10P (61 cores, 1.1GHz) op een STREAM Triad benchmark 79.5 GB/s vs. 175GB/s )
9. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 productfamilie server vs. Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor (10.75x: Gemeten door Intel ctober 2012. 2 socket E5-2670 (8 core, 2.6GHz) vs. 1 Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor SE10P (61 cores, 1.1GHz) op een Single Precision Monte Carlo Simulatie. 45,501 opties/sec vs. 489,354 opties/sec )
10. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2670 server vs. dezelfde 2 socket server met 2 Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor SE10 geinstalleerd (Calculated Theoretical Peak Dual Precision FLOPS: 332.8 GF/s vs.( 332.8 +( 2 x 1073.6 GF/s)))